Concepts innovants pour une nouvelle jeunesse aux jeux !!!

[Abel Emma]

The community will judge if you extended gruby kardigan damski core and berate the crap out of you if you stay too insular and "leech", but in general, these endeavours are extension modules, plugins, management systems, using the liberal code as a component. GPL? It's a service on top of it for support or customization. RMS even noted that you would sell your service to maintain and extend the code in his original writings as I recall. That's a woefully limited business model, and removes the leverage of the digital medium entirely.2. GPL is first and foremost a political tool – work of a genius – which allowed something unprecedented.

Therefore some time ago an "Open Source" movement spurted from unknown sources to add non-GPL licenses which would neutralize exactly the hated "viral" nature of GPL. Many do not recognize to this day that the idea behind that was to kill GPL, not to expand czerwony sweter damski the falsely named "Open Source" movement.5. Now Ubuntu szar, this very Mark Shattleworth, if I got the story correctly, blessed Mono for bundling with their Linux distro, and for the sake of truly unnecessary "personal productivity" i.e. trifle applications. And the lemmings squeak indignantly when RMS warns of the possible sweter damski długi trojaning of Linux with MS technologies.

as there is a danger of MS later claiming some patent rights or imposing restrictions or incompatibilities.I would agree that the comments from "What_GPL_means" come across as especially rant-ish. I'm never too happy with comments that seem to be more about rambling stream-of-consciousness than actually addressing anybody's points. But I'm leaving this comment to stand as a representation of this point of view. If other comments come in of similar length and lack of focus, I will take the liberty of moderating them.re What_GPL_means – There's a valuable thread in your posting I believe.

Companies szary kardigan are rarely ideological, and never pure. Such characteristics do not preclude them making valuable contributions to society, communities and projects.We all need to avoid making judgements and proclamations with too-broad of a brush, and with only partial information. Polarizing opinions don't enhance the situation one whit. Microsoft may be legitimately vilified but they too have efforts and valid contributions spanning the GPL through the liberal licenses to proprietary efforts. IBM, Sun, Apple and many others all are valuable contributors and supporters of projects such as Linux, gcc, gdb to name a few.

Were you to remove all the contributions of those corporations based on their clouded or non-existent ideologies, the projects would be much reduced from their current capabilities.i think the conversation is far from over; we need to have vital communities around each of these license models in order to fully explore what is only the beginning of the incredible journey software on which software will take humanity; the end of GPL, or the end of commercial licenses, would be a real tragedy at this stage; so statements of the pattern "i won't touch x" are less interesting to me than comments along the.

lines of "i usually prefer x bu kolorowy sweter t these are the circumstances under which i'll use y"; it's not a zero-sum game, each of these three licence categories are producing tremendous results and together they are greater than the sum of their partsAn earlier commenter made the point that 90% of WordPress' customers don't care what the license is. I'd say that's accurate for 90% of the people using any open source project. They don't care as long as free remains "free, as in cost." They aren't looking at the code, they don't know what GPL is, muc h less what it entails. But the 10% left does.